<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 149 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100214</link>
    <description>Section 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 does not confer an unlimited power to stay all proceedings against a company. The expression &quot;proceeding&quot; does not extend to statutory assessment or penalty proceedings before the sales tax under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, because that Act is a complete code governing assessment, penalty and interest and the company court cannot restrain the statutory authority from discharging its functions. By contrast, once recovery proceedings are initiated against the company&#039;s assets, a stay may be granted because such recovery affects the company&#039;s estate and the interests of unsecured creditors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:02:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 149 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100214</link>
      <description>Section 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 does not confer an unlimited power to stay all proceedings against a company. The expression &quot;proceeding&quot; does not extend to statutory assessment or penalty proceedings before the sales tax under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, because that Act is a complete code governing assessment, penalty and interest and the company court cannot restrain the statutory authority from discharging its functions. By contrast, once recovery proceedings are initiated against the company&#039;s assets, a stay may be granted because such recovery affects the company&#039;s estate and the interests of unsecured creditors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>