<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 148 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100211</link>
    <description>The court concluded it lacked jurisdiction under Section 392 to adjudicate disputed claims against third parties. However, it authorized the court committee to enforce the company&#039;s rights under the agreement, directing legal actions for specific performance, damages, or return of earnest money. An ad interim relief maintaining the status quo on the Borivli land transfer was granted until May 15, 1982.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:56:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 148 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100211</link>
      <description>The court concluded it lacked jurisdiction under Section 392 to adjudicate disputed claims against third parties. However, it authorized the court committee to enforce the company&#039;s rights under the agreement, directing legal actions for specific performance, damages, or return of earnest money. An ad interim relief maintaining the status quo on the Borivli land transfer was granted until May 15, 1982.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>