<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 250 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100206</link>
    <description>The court found the company&#039;s defense to be unbelievable, rejecting their contentions due to inconsistencies in the affidavit-in-opposition and a dubious receipt. The petition for winding up the company was admitted, and an order for advertisement was made, with specific instructions for publication and a returnable date set eight weeks hence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:53:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 250 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100206</link>
      <description>The court found the company&#039;s defense to be unbelievable, rejecting their contentions due to inconsistencies in the affidavit-in-opposition and a dubious receipt. The petition for winding up the company was admitted, and an order for advertisement was made, with specific instructions for publication and a returnable date set eight weeks hence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>