<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 796 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100203</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to the violation of natural justice principles. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of a fair opportunity of hearing. The typographical error in the order regarding the section for confiscation of goods was considered insignificant and did not affect the validity of the proceedings. The appellants were directed to cooperate for the expedited resolution of the case upon remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:48:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 796 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100203</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to the violation of natural justice principles. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of a fair opportunity of hearing. The typographical error in the order regarding the section for confiscation of goods was considered insignificant and did not affect the validity of the proceedings. The appellants were directed to cooperate for the expedited resolution of the case upon remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>