<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 795 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100202</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the Tribunal directed the Department to mutilate the Z.P. Sliders under Customs Officer supervision, with costs borne by the appellant. The evidence presented supported the argument that the goods were intended for scrap and not resale as functional sliders, leading to the appeal being allowed and the impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:47:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 795 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100202</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the Tribunal directed the Department to mutilate the Z.P. Sliders under Customs Officer supervision, with costs borne by the appellant. The evidence presented supported the argument that the goods were intended for scrap and not resale as functional sliders, leading to the appeal being allowed and the impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>