https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100195 Public Notice No. 2/2001 was interpreted as covering only cases in which an appeal had first been filed before the Western Zonal Bench at Mumbai and a later request was made for hearing at Delhi for expeditious disposal. An appeal filed initially at New Delhi did not fall within that procedure, so it could not be retained there. The matter was therefore required to be filed before the Mumbai Bench, while the New Delhi filing date was directed to be treated as the filing date for record purposes. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:37:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100195 Public Notice No. 2/2001 was interpreted as covering only cases in which an appeal had first been filed before the Western Zonal Bench at Mumbai and a later request was made for hearing at Delhi for expeditious disposal. An appeal filed initially at New Delhi did not fall within that procedure, so it could not be retained there. The matter was therefore required to be filed before the Mumbai Bench, while the New Delhi filing date was directed to be treated as the filing date for record purposes. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 19 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100195