<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 210 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100191</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, confirming that directors appointed under Section 408(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, continue to hold office until completion of their term. It held that any change in the board of directors must be confirmed under Section 408(5). The court refused the stay application due to serious irregularities by the company and significant public interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:22:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 210 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100191</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, confirming that directors appointed under Section 408(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, continue to hold office until completion of their term. It held that any change in the board of directors must be confirmed under Section 408(5). The court refused the stay application due to serious irregularities by the company and significant public interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>