<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 237 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100188</link>
    <description>The court granted a permanent stay of voluntary winding-up proceedings and allowed the revival of the company for establishing a cement plant. The applicant, authorized to present the application, successfully argued for the stay under sections 518 and 466 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court emphasized shareholders&#039; ability to revive the company themselves to prevent further winding-up steps, considering the national interest in increased cement production. The decision enabled the shareholders to elect a new board of directors and pursue the company&#039;s objectives, emphasizing the court&#039;s power to stay winding-up based on justifiable reasons for revival.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:19:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 237 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100188</link>
      <description>The court granted a permanent stay of voluntary winding-up proceedings and allowed the revival of the company for establishing a cement plant. The applicant, authorized to present the application, successfully argued for the stay under sections 518 and 466 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court emphasized shareholders&#039; ability to revive the company themselves to prevent further winding-up steps, considering the national interest in increased cement production. The decision enabled the shareholders to elect a new board of directors and pursue the company&#039;s objectives, emphasizing the court&#039;s power to stay winding-up based on justifiable reasons for revival.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>