<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 236 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100183</link>
    <description>The court found the annual general meetings held in December 1969 and April 1970 invalid due to the absence of notices to certain shareholders, rendering resolutions passed therein unauthorized. The allotment of 1,000 equity shares was deemed invalid as it aimed to exclude a shareholder from management. The court concluded that the company, essentially a partnership, should be wound up on just and equitable grounds due to the breakdown of mutual trust. The opposition of majority shareholders to winding up was dismissed, and the decision to dissolve the company was upheld, emphasizing the need for joint management based on mutual confidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 236 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100183</link>
      <description>The court found the annual general meetings held in December 1969 and April 1970 invalid due to the absence of notices to certain shareholders, rendering resolutions passed therein unauthorized. The allotment of 1,000 equity shares was deemed invalid as it aimed to exclude a shareholder from management. The court concluded that the company, essentially a partnership, should be wound up on just and equitable grounds due to the breakdown of mutual trust. The opposition of majority shareholders to winding up was dismissed, and the decision to dissolve the company was upheld, emphasizing the need for joint management based on mutual confidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>