<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (11) TMI 156 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100161</link>
    <description>The court found no oppression under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act but intervened under Section 398 due to prejudicial conduct, resolving the deadlock by offering shareholders options to buy shares. The court emphasized equitable jurisdiction to prevent future disputes and ensure smooth company management.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:27:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (11) TMI 156 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100161</link>
      <description>The court found no oppression under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act but intervened under Section 398 due to prejudicial conduct, resolving the deadlock by offering shareholders options to buy shares. The court emphasized equitable jurisdiction to prevent future disputes and ensure smooth company management.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>