<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 148 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100142</link>
    <description>A debenture transaction with a conversion option was treated as a valid issue of convertible debentures, not a direct allotment of shares under the further issue of capital regime, because the documentary record as a whole consistently supported that characterisation. Waiver of the contractual one-month notice for conversion did not by itself establish mala fides, as the notice period was only a contractual incident and no improper purpose was proved. Relief was also defeated by the plaintiffs&#039; acquiescence and ratification after knowledge of the transaction. Non-joinder of the debenture trustee did not vitiate the suit, but rectification of the register was refused on equitable and discretionary grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:10:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 148 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100142</link>
      <description>A debenture transaction with a conversion option was treated as a valid issue of convertible debentures, not a direct allotment of shares under the further issue of capital regime, because the documentary record as a whole consistently supported that characterisation. Waiver of the contractual one-month notice for conversion did not by itself establish mala fides, as the notice period was only a contractual incident and no improper purpose was proved. Relief was also defeated by the plaintiffs&#039; acquiescence and ratification after knowledge of the transaction. Non-joinder of the debenture trustee did not vitiate the suit, but rectification of the register was refused on equitable and discretionary grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>