<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 134 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100129</link>
    <description>An unconditional bank guarantee creates an independent and absolute obligation on the bank to pay on demand within the stipulated time, without proof of default by the company in liquidation. Liquidation of the principal debtor does not discharge the surety, because discharge by operation of law in liquidation does not affect the guarantor&#039;s liability. The creditor may enforce the guarantee notwithstanding winding-up proceedings, and the company court cannot restrain payment merely because the bank may later seek reimbursement from the company&#039;s securities, as that is a separate matter between the bank and the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 134 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100129</link>
      <description>An unconditional bank guarantee creates an independent and absolute obligation on the bank to pay on demand within the stipulated time, without proof of default by the company in liquidation. Liquidation of the principal debtor does not discharge the surety, because discharge by operation of law in liquidation does not affect the guarantor&#039;s liability. The creditor may enforce the guarantee notwithstanding winding-up proceedings, and the company court cannot restrain payment merely because the bank may later seek reimbursement from the company&#039;s securities, as that is a separate matter between the bank and the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>