<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 699 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100123</link>
    <description>Money credit earned by the original manufacturer before takeover remained available for utilisation by the transferee where the transferee had taken over the factory together with its assets and liabilities. The transferee was treated as stepping into the shoes of the transferor for the purpose of using the accrued credit, so the objection based on the takeover failed. The order denying credit could not be sustained, and utilisation of the earned credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:42:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 699 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100123</link>
      <description>Money credit earned by the original manufacturer before takeover remained available for utilisation by the transferee where the transferee had taken over the factory together with its assets and liabilities. The transferee was treated as stepping into the shoes of the transferor for the purpose of using the accrued credit, so the objection based on the takeover failed. The order denying credit could not be sustained, and utilisation of the earned credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>