<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 698 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100121</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata allowed all appeals challenging the confiscation of betelnuts for alleged smuggling, confiscation of conveyance, and imposition of penalties. The Tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence proving the foreign origin of the betelnuts, emphasizing the Revenue&#039;s failure to meet the burden of proof. Relying on trade opinions rather than expert opinions was deemed inadequate. Following precedents, the Tribunal set aside the confiscations, stressing the necessity of substantial evidence, especially for non-notified items like betelnuts, and granted relief to the appellants by overturning the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:41:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 698 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100121</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata allowed all appeals challenging the confiscation of betelnuts for alleged smuggling, confiscation of conveyance, and imposition of penalties. The Tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence proving the foreign origin of the betelnuts, emphasizing the Revenue&#039;s failure to meet the burden of proof. Relying on trade opinions rather than expert opinions was deemed inadequate. Following precedents, the Tribunal set aside the confiscations, stressing the necessity of substantial evidence, especially for non-notified items like betelnuts, and granted relief to the appellants by overturning the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>