https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100115 The court ruled that appeals under section 155(4)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 should be heard by a Division Bench of two judges in High Courts with three or more judges, rejecting the appellant's argument for a Full Bench. The court emphasized interpreting statutes based on their natural meaning and legislative intent, dismissing the contention that a Full Court should hear the appeals. The decision aimed to give effect to the statutory provision's requirement for appeals to be heard by a Bench consisting of three or more judges, ensuring compliance with the law. en-us Mon, 08 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:32:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100115 The court ruled that appeals under section 155(4)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 should be heard by a Division Bench of two judges in High Courts with three or more judges, rejecting the appellant's argument for a Full Bench. The court emphasized interpreting statutes based on their natural meaning and legislative intent, dismissing the contention that a Full Court should hear the appeals. The decision aimed to give effect to the statutory provision's requirement for appeals to be heard by a Bench consisting of three or more judges, ensuring compliance with the law. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100115