<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (11) TMI 140 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100108</link>
    <description>In a prosecution for default in filing the statement of affairs under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956, absence of reasonable excuse is an essential ingredient that the prosecution must prove. Where the company&#039;s records were not available to the accused, the books had remained with the Revenue authorities, and there was no reliable proof that the records were made available for inspection or for preparing the statement, the default was treated as attributable to a reasonable excuse. The accused were therefore given the benefit of doubt and acquitted. The material principle is that mere default is insufficient unless the prosecution establishes that it occurred without reasonable excuse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:25:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (11) TMI 140 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100108</link>
      <description>In a prosecution for default in filing the statement of affairs under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956, absence of reasonable excuse is an essential ingredient that the prosecution must prove. Where the company&#039;s records were not available to the accused, the books had remained with the Revenue authorities, and there was no reliable proof that the records were made available for inspection or for preparing the statement, the default was treated as attributable to a reasonable excuse. The accused were therefore given the benefit of doubt and acquitted. The material principle is that mere default is insufficient unless the prosecution establishes that it occurred without reasonable excuse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>