<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (10) TMI 137 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100104</link>
    <description>The court found that the petition was not signed by the required number of members as per the Companies Act. Due to misrepresentation in obtaining signatures, the court deemed the consent of certain petitioners invalid, leading to the dismissal of the petition. The judgment emphasized the necessity of genuine and voluntary consent from the appropriate number of members for filing petitions under the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:22:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (10) TMI 137 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100104</link>
      <description>The court found that the petition was not signed by the required number of members as per the Companies Act. Due to misrepresentation in obtaining signatures, the court deemed the consent of certain petitioners invalid, leading to the dismissal of the petition. The judgment emphasized the necessity of genuine and voluntary consent from the appropriate number of members for filing petitions under the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>