<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 237 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100094</link>
    <description>Section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 allows &quot;any member&quot; to seek rectification of the register, and the court may grant interim relief where appropriate, so locus standi and interlocutory injunction were not barred. Entries for shares Exs. A and B were upheld because closure of the register under section 154 does not prohibit transmission entries, and section 84 of the Estate Duty Act does not apply to transmission by operation of law. Entries for Ex. F were also sustained because acceptance of the transfer related back to the date of the transfer deed, and the death of one joint transferee did not invalidate the transfer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:07:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 237 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100094</link>
      <description>Section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 allows &quot;any member&quot; to seek rectification of the register, and the court may grant interim relief where appropriate, so locus standi and interlocutory injunction were not barred. Entries for shares Exs. A and B were upheld because closure of the register under section 154 does not prohibit transmission entries, and section 84 of the Estate Duty Act does not apply to transmission by operation of law. Entries for Ex. F were also sustained because acceptance of the transfer related back to the date of the transfer deed, and the death of one joint transferee did not invalidate the transfer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>