<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 189 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100058</link>
    <description>Corporate personality may be disregarded where incorporation is used as a device, cloak, or sham to perpetrate fraud or defeat legitimate claims, and an adverse inference may follow when material facts lie within a defendant&#039;s special knowledge but are withheld. On the materials discussed, incomplete disclosure of shareholding, capital structure, control, and the source of funds supported a prima facie view that the entities were being used to hold properties and keep them beyond the plaintiff&#039;s reach. The text also notes that attachment before judgment and ad interim restraint may be warranted to preserve disputed properties and prevent alienation pending trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 189 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100058</link>
      <description>Corporate personality may be disregarded where incorporation is used as a device, cloak, or sham to perpetrate fraud or defeat legitimate claims, and an adverse inference may follow when material facts lie within a defendant&#039;s special knowledge but are withheld. On the materials discussed, incomplete disclosure of shareholding, capital structure, control, and the source of funds supported a prima facie view that the entities were being used to hold properties and keep them beyond the plaintiff&#039;s reach. The text also notes that attachment before judgment and ad interim restraint may be warranted to preserve disputed properties and prevent alienation pending trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>