<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 625 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100049</link>
    <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence under Regulation 21(2) is permissible only as an exceptional, urgent measure and must be supported by material showing an emergent need; here, the order was issued without notice and without compliance with the prescribed procedure. The absence of any basis for dispensing with notice meant the power was exercised outside its proper scope and in breach of natural justice. The suspension was therefore not sustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 625 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100049</link>
      <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence under Regulation 21(2) is permissible only as an exceptional, urgent measure and must be supported by material showing an emergent need; here, the order was issued without notice and without compliance with the prescribed procedure. The absence of any basis for dispensing with notice meant the power was exercised outside its proper scope and in breach of natural justice. The suspension was therefore not sustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>