<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 153 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100033</link>
    <description>In sanctioned amalgamation proceedings, the voting right on the scheme belongs only to members of the transferor and transferee companies, not to creditors or other interested persons. The phrase &quot;liable to be wound up&quot; in the amalgamation provisions is construed broadly, so a financially sound company may still participate in reconstruction. Tenancy rights form part of &quot;property&quot; vesting in the transferee by operation of law under the scheme, so landlord consent is not required at sanction stage. The Court also held the schemes to be consistent with public interest and approved them with modifications, creditor protection measures, vesting directions, and dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 153 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100033</link>
      <description>In sanctioned amalgamation proceedings, the voting right on the scheme belongs only to members of the transferor and transferee companies, not to creditors or other interested persons. The phrase &quot;liable to be wound up&quot; in the amalgamation provisions is construed broadly, so a financially sound company may still participate in reconstruction. Tenancy rights form part of &quot;property&quot; vesting in the transferee by operation of law under the scheme, so landlord consent is not required at sanction stage. The Court also held the schemes to be consistent with public interest and approved them with modifications, creditor protection measures, vesting directions, and dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>