<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (12) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100026</link>
    <description>Excise duty paid on raw tobacco was held not deductible from the gross turnover of chewing tobacco sold under rule 5(1)(i) of the Madras General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, 1939. The phrase &quot;in respect of&quot; was construed to apply only to duty paid on the same goods actually sold by the dealer, not on a different commodity used as manufacturing input. Raw tobacco and chewing tobacco were treated as distinct marketable products, so duty on the raw material could not be claimed as duty on the finished goods. The deduction was therefore confined to duty paid on the goods sold, and the construction favoured the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (12) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100026</link>
      <description>Excise duty paid on raw tobacco was held not deductible from the gross turnover of chewing tobacco sold under rule 5(1)(i) of the Madras General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, 1939. The phrase &quot;in respect of&quot; was construed to apply only to duty paid on the same goods actually sold by the dealer, not on a different commodity used as manufacturing input. Raw tobacco and chewing tobacco were treated as distinct marketable products, so duty on the raw material could not be claimed as duty on the finished goods. The deduction was therefore confined to duty paid on the goods sold, and the construction favoured the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>