https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100018 A transferee-company that succeeded to a decree-holder's interest under an amalgamation scheme could continue a pending execution under section 146 CPC, and the absence of a formal substitution order under Order 21 Rule 16 was treated as a matter of form. An order allowing continuation of execution was valid where the earlier execution order had only been set aside with liberty to take further steps. The property was held to have passed under the amalgamation order, with rectification relating back to the original order, so escheat and bona vacantia did not apply. The decree remained executable against the judgment-debtors, including the sub-tenant, and the police-help direction was upheld. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:35:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100018 A transferee-company that succeeded to a decree-holder's interest under an amalgamation scheme could continue a pending execution under section 146 CPC, and the absence of a formal substitution order under Order 21 Rule 16 was treated as a matter of form. An order allowing continuation of execution was valid where the earlier execution order had only been set aside with liberty to take further steps. The property was held to have passed under the amalgamation order, with rectification relating back to the original order, so escheat and bona vacantia did not apply. The decree remained executable against the judgment-debtors, including the sub-tenant, and the police-help direction was upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 14 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100018