<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 219 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100013</link>
    <description>Leave granted under clause 12 of the Letters Patent is discussed as revocable where no substantive part of the cause of action arises within jurisdiction and forum convenience favours the defendants. The text notes that mere receipt of a balance-sheet within Calcutta was treated as only a source of knowledge, not a jurisdictional fact, and that an unclear pleading about business carried on through an office was insufficient. It further states that section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure was inapplicable to suits on the Original Side, and that the plaintiff&#039;s forum choice was not decisive against serious inconvenience to the defendants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 219 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100013</link>
      <description>Leave granted under clause 12 of the Letters Patent is discussed as revocable where no substantive part of the cause of action arises within jurisdiction and forum convenience favours the defendants. The text notes that mere receipt of a balance-sheet within Calcutta was treated as only a source of knowledge, not a jurisdictional fact, and that an unclear pleading about business carried on through an office was insufficient. It further states that section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure was inapplicable to suits on the Original Side, and that the plaintiff&#039;s forum choice was not decisive against serious inconvenience to the defendants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>