<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (10) TMI 40 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100003</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order. It declared that the turnover of the Company for the years 1954-55, 1955-56, and 1956-57 was exempt from sales tax under the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act, 1950. The Company was entitled to its costs in the appeals in both the Supreme Court and the High Court. The transactions were classified as inter-State sales and thus not subject to State sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (10) TMI 40 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100003</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order. It declared that the turnover of the Company for the years 1954-55, 1955-56, and 1956-57 was exempt from sales tax under the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act, 1950. The Company was entitled to its costs in the appeals in both the Supreme Court and the High Court. The transactions were classified as inter-State sales and thus not subject to State sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>