<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 765 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99992</link>
    <description>Lubricating oil imported in larger packing sizes for use in heavy machinery was treated as industrial input rather than consumer goods under Para 7(12) of the Exim Policy 1992-97, because the test turned on whether the goods were directly consumable by an ordinary consumer or intended for industrial use. The Tribunal distinguished precedent involving small-pack motor vehicle lubricants and upheld the finding that such heavy-machinery lubricants were not consumer goods, so confiscation as unauthorised import was not warranted. A further argument based on serial No. 55 of Appendix XXXV was not entertained because it had not been raised at the lower stages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 765 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99992</link>
      <description>Lubricating oil imported in larger packing sizes for use in heavy machinery was treated as industrial input rather than consumer goods under Para 7(12) of the Exim Policy 1992-97, because the test turned on whether the goods were directly consumable by an ordinary consumer or intended for industrial use. The Tribunal distinguished precedent involving small-pack motor vehicle lubricants and upheld the finding that such heavy-machinery lubricants were not consumer goods, so confiscation as unauthorised import was not warranted. A further argument based on serial No. 55 of Appendix XXXV was not entertained because it had not been raised at the lower stages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>