<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 761 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99988</link>
    <description>Section 11D applies only where an assessee has actually collected from the buyer an amount representing excise duty. Mere passing on of the duty burden, or the taking of notional Modvat credit on inputs under Rule 57B, does not satisfy that statutory requirement. On the facts, no amount was collected from the buyer as excise duty, so the precondition for invoking Section 11D was absent. Recovery of the notional Modvat credit was therefore unsustainable, and the demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:59:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 761 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99988</link>
      <description>Section 11D applies only where an assessee has actually collected from the buyer an amount representing excise duty. Mere passing on of the duty burden, or the taking of notional Modvat credit on inputs under Rule 57B, does not satisfy that statutory requirement. On the facts, no amount was collected from the buyer as excise duty, so the precondition for invoking Section 11D was absent. Recovery of the notional Modvat credit was therefore unsustainable, and the demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>