https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99957 The Companies Act was treated as a consolidating statute, not a complete code, so ordinary civil court jurisdiction was not excluded merely because the Act provided limited internal remedies. The rule in Foss v. Harbottle was applied as a restraint on interference, not an absolute bar; representative suits remained maintainable where the complaint involved ultra vires acts, breach of constitutional documents, fraud on the minority, or infringement of enforceable rights. Chapter VI remedies for oppression and mismanagement were also treated as special statutory remedies, not an implied exclusion of civil suits where the statutory forum was unavailable. en-us Mon, 01 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:28:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99957 The Companies Act was treated as a consolidating statute, not a complete code, so ordinary civil court jurisdiction was not excluded merely because the Act provided limited internal remedies. The rule in Foss v. Harbottle was applied as a restraint on interference, not an absolute bar; representative suits remained maintainable where the complaint involved ultra vires acts, breach of constitutional documents, fraud on the minority, or infringement of enforceable rights. Chapter VI remedies for oppression and mismanagement were also treated as special statutory remedies, not an implied exclusion of civil suits where the statutory forum was unavailable. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 01 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99957