<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (5) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99955</link>
    <description>Company articles prescribing execution of binding instruments by two directors with the common seal make compliance mandatory. A shareholder resolution cannot override that prescribed authority structure; where the seal is required, execution without it is unauthorised and cannot be retrospectively validated. The lease deed therefore did not validly bind the company. As a company is a separate legal person, relief for a wrong to it must ordinarily be sought in its own name. Directors cannot sue individually for such relief absent a recognised exception, including fraud; without such an exception, a suit brought by directors to avoid the lease is not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:23:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (5) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99955</link>
      <description>Company articles prescribing execution of binding instruments by two directors with the common seal make compliance mandatory. A shareholder resolution cannot override that prescribed authority structure; where the seal is required, execution without it is unauthorised and cannot be retrospectively validated. The lease deed therefore did not validly bind the company. As a company is a separate legal person, relief for a wrong to it must ordinarily be sought in its own name. Directors cannot sue individually for such relief absent a recognised exception, including fraud; without such an exception, a suit brought by directors to avoid the lease is not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>