https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99950 An application under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act seeking reference to the High Court was found not maintainable where the Tribunal had decided the Modvat credit dispute on ramming mass by following a High Court ruling and a Larger Bench view. The text states that, in the event of conflicting decisions of two High Courts, the proper course is to seek a statement of case to the Supreme Court under Section 35H rather than a reference to the High Court under Section 35G. As no Section 35H application had been filed, the reference request was rejected. en-us Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:56:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99950 An application under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act seeking reference to the High Court was found not maintainable where the Tribunal had decided the Modvat credit dispute on ramming mass by following a High Court ruling and a Larger Bench view. The text states that, in the event of conflicting decisions of two High Courts, the proper course is to seek a statement of case to the Supreme Court under Section 35H rather than a reference to the High Court under Section 35G. As no Section 35H application had been filed, the reference request was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99950