<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 738 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99948</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai directed the appellant Commissioner to cure defects in the memorandum of appeal and stay petition. One defect was cured, but the other in the stay petition remained. The stay petition was rejected due to lack of verification and grounds for stay. The appeal memorandum will proceed for regular hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 738 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99948</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai directed the appellant Commissioner to cure defects in the memorandum of appeal and stay petition. One defect was cured, but the other in the stay petition remained. The stay petition was rejected due to lack of verification and grounds for stay. The appeal memorandum will proceed for regular hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>