<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 735 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99944</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals), Trichy, allowed the appeal against the Order-in-Original confiscating cloves due to investigative lapses and overreliance on circumstantial evidence. The decision emphasized the importance of verifying primary evidence, such as the Certificate of Origin, before drawing conclusions based on circumstantial factors. Thorough investigation in customs cases was highlighted as essential for fair adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 735 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99944</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals), Trichy, allowed the appeal against the Order-in-Original confiscating cloves due to investigative lapses and overreliance on circumstantial evidence. The decision emphasized the importance of verifying primary evidence, such as the Certificate of Origin, before drawing conclusions based on circumstantial factors. Thorough investigation in customs cases was highlighted as essential for fair adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>