<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 729 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99937</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal due to a filing delay, remanding the matter for a decision on merits. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; arguments that the demand and recovery proceedings were not sustainable based on a previous successful appeal, condoning the delay. The decision aligned with a Supreme Court precedent allowing delays in similar cases, emphasizing the non-sustainability of the demands raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:25:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 729 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99937</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal due to a filing delay, remanding the matter for a decision on merits. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; arguments that the demand and recovery proceedings were not sustainable based on a previous successful appeal, condoning the delay. The decision aligned with a Supreme Court precedent allowing delays in similar cases, emphasizing the non-sustainability of the demands raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>