<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 987 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99933</link>
    <description>Where a pre-deposit direction was made in the presence of counsel and due notice was shown, a plea of lack of knowledge of the hearing did not justify restoration of the appeal dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no sufficient ground to revive the matter and rejected the restoration application, leaving the earlier dismissal in place.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:23:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 987 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99933</link>
      <description>Where a pre-deposit direction was made in the presence of counsel and due notice was shown, a plea of lack of knowledge of the hearing did not justify restoration of the appeal dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no sufficient ground to revive the matter and rejected the restoration application, leaving the earlier dismissal in place.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>