<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (1) TMI 49 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99928</link>
    <description>A body-building contract was construed by examining the agreement as a whole to determine whether it was a sale of goods or a contract for work and labour for sales tax purposes. The majority treated it as an arrangement for the construction and supply of composite bodies for a fixed price per unit, with delivery terms and transfer of property on delivery, and found no term inconsistent with a sale. On that basis, the transaction was characterised as a sale of goods and was liable to sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953. A dissenting view considered the dominant character to be construction work on Government-supplied chassis and not a sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (1) TMI 49 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99928</link>
      <description>A body-building contract was construed by examining the agreement as a whole to determine whether it was a sale of goods or a contract for work and labour for sales tax purposes. The majority treated it as an arrangement for the construction and supply of composite bodies for a fixed price per unit, with delivery terms and transfer of property on delivery, and found no term inconsistent with a sale. On that basis, the transaction was characterised as a sale of goods and was liable to sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953. A dissenting view considered the dominant character to be construction work on Government-supplied chassis and not a sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>