<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (10) TMI 57 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99922</link>
    <description>The U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 originally limited escaped-assessment proceedings to three years from the end of the assessment year and did not distinguish between suo motu reassessment and reassessment made under appellate or revisional directions. A retrospective amendment to section 21 later authorised reassessment on escaped turnover and excluded the limitation period where reassessment was made to give effect to a finding or direction under the Act. Because the amendment was deemed to operate from the commencement of the principal Act, reassessment pursuant to the revisional direction was treated as within jurisdiction and not barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (10) TMI 57 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99922</link>
      <description>The U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 originally limited escaped-assessment proceedings to three years from the end of the assessment year and did not distinguish between suo motu reassessment and reassessment made under appellate or revisional directions. A retrospective amendment to section 21 later authorised reassessment on escaped turnover and excluded the limitation period where reassessment was made to give effect to a finding or direction under the Act. Because the amendment was deemed to operate from the commencement of the principal Act, reassessment pursuant to the revisional direction was treated as within jurisdiction and not barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>