<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 201 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99921</link>
    <description>Section 124 privilege was upheld for a government-appointed inspector&#039;s report prepared under section 239 of the Companies Act, 1956, because the report was made in official confidence and disclosure before governmental consideration could prejudice public interest. The report was described as preliminary, potentially incomplete without the company&#039;s explanation, and capable of influencing further inquiry if disclosed too early. On that basis, the court refused to have the report summoned or produced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:01:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 201 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99921</link>
      <description>Section 124 privilege was upheld for a government-appointed inspector&#039;s report prepared under section 239 of the Companies Act, 1956, because the report was made in official confidence and disclosure before governmental consideration could prejudice public interest. The report was described as preliminary, potentially incomplete without the company&#039;s explanation, and capable of influencing further inquiry if disclosed too early. On that basis, the court refused to have the report summoned or produced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>