<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 964 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99897</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed two appeals filed by assessees against the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), Ahmedabad, condoning the delay in filing the appeals. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the Appellate Authority for consideration on merits. The appeals and stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:13:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 964 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99897</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed two appeals filed by assessees against the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), Ahmedabad, condoning the delay in filing the appeals. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the Appellate Authority for consideration on merits. The appeals and stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>