<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 962 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99895</link>
    <description>Spent palladium catalyst cleared for recovery of palladium chloride under the Modvat scheme was treated as a dispute already resolved in favour of the assessee by a prior Larger Bench decision. The Tribunal followed that binding view and did not adopt any contrary interpretation on whether the spent catalyst could be treated as waste under Rule 57F(2). As a result, the assessee received relief, the impugned orders were set aside, and consequential relief followed according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:08:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 962 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99895</link>
      <description>Spent palladium catalyst cleared for recovery of palladium chloride under the Modvat scheme was treated as a dispute already resolved in favour of the assessee by a prior Larger Bench decision. The Tribunal followed that binding view and did not adopt any contrary interpretation on whether the spent catalyst could be treated as waste under Rule 57F(2). As a result, the assessee received relief, the impugned orders were set aside, and consequential relief followed according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>