<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 961 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99894</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, small-scale manufacturers, in a case involving duty demand and penalty imposition for clearing final products at nil duty after exceeding the exemption limit. The Tribunal held that the demand for duty was time-barred as there was no suppression of facts, aligning with a previous decision that omission of progressive clearance totals did not constitute suppression. The appellants were granted relief based on the limitation issue, emphasizing the importance of timely duty payments and the interpretation of limitation periods in excise duty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 961 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99894</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, small-scale manufacturers, in a case involving duty demand and penalty imposition for clearing final products at nil duty after exceeding the exemption limit. The Tribunal held that the demand for duty was time-barred as there was no suppression of facts, aligning with a previous decision that omission of progressive clearance totals did not constitute suppression. The appellants were granted relief based on the limitation issue, emphasizing the importance of timely duty payments and the interpretation of limitation periods in excise duty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>