https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99891 Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act does not protect possession against a successor in interest where the transfer is incomplete, and a dissolved company cannot be represented by its liquidator to execute a deed of sale without express statutory authority. Conduct amounting to acceptance of rent and acquiescence in the transfer may also estop a landlord from later denying the transferee's title. The discussion concludes that part performance was unavailable, the post-dissolution sale deed lacked authority, and estoppel operated on the plaintiffs' conduct. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jun 2025 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99891 Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act does not protect possession against a successor in interest where the transfer is incomplete, and a dissolved company cannot be represented by its liquidator to execute a deed of sale without express statutory authority. Conduct amounting to acceptance of rent and acquiescence in the transfer may also estop a landlord from later denying the transferee's title. The discussion concludes that part performance was unavailable, the post-dissolution sale deed lacked authority, and estoppel operated on the plaintiffs' conduct. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 25 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99891