<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 952 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99885</link>
    <description>Classification of the chemically complex product could not be finally determined on the existing record because the technical material was conflicting and incomplete, and its exact chemical formula and structure were not available. The prior authorities had relied on expert reports, but the adjudicating authority had not examined the competing claim under Tariff sub-heading 2922.00 in the first instance. The dispute was therefore remitted for fresh adjudication, with reconsideration of the classification issue on the basis of technical literature, existing expert opinion, and any further evidence produced by the parties, followed by a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 952 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99885</link>
      <description>Classification of the chemically complex product could not be finally determined on the existing record because the technical material was conflicting and incomplete, and its exact chemical formula and structure were not available. The prior authorities had relied on expert reports, but the adjudicating authority had not examined the competing claim under Tariff sub-heading 2922.00 in the first instance. The dispute was therefore remitted for fresh adjudication, with reconsideration of the classification issue on the basis of technical literature, existing expert opinion, and any further evidence produced by the parties, followed by a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>