https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99880 An appeal dismissed for non-appearance and alleged non-compliance with a stay order was restored where the explanation for absence was accepted. The objection based on the bond was treated as technical, because the bond had in fact been executed, signed by the Superintendent, and accepted by the Revenue. On that basis, the dismissal was set aside and the appeal was restored to its original number. en-us Mon, 30 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:39:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99880 An appeal dismissed for non-appearance and alleged non-compliance with a stay order was restored where the explanation for absence was accepted. The objection based on the bond was treated as technical, because the bond had in fact been executed, signed by the Superintendent, and accepted by the Revenue. On that basis, the dismissal was set aside and the appeal was restored to its original number. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99880