https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99875 Whether an application to amend a company petition is time barred turns on application of the winding up exclusion in limitation computation: the period from commencement of winding up to the winding up order and one year after that are excluded when computing the five year limitation for applications under the Companies Act, so the contested amendment filing was held timely after excluding that combined period. On the amendment itself, permitting insertion of substantive reliefs is appropriate once limitation is satisfied; objections on merits can be raised subsequently and respondents may file further counter pleadings, with the amendment allowed and no costs order. en-us Fri, 03 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:30:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99875 Whether an application to amend a company petition is time barred turns on application of the winding up exclusion in limitation computation: the period from commencement of winding up to the winding up order and one year after that are excluded when computing the five year limitation for applications under the Companies Act, so the contested amendment filing was held timely after excluding that combined period. On the amendment itself, permitting insertion of substantive reliefs is appropriate once limitation is satisfied; objections on merits can be raised subsequently and respondents may file further counter pleadings, with the amendment allowed and no costs order. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 03 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99875