https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99863 Revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to jurisdictional error, illegality or material irregularity and does not permit reassessment of concurrent discretionary refusals of temporary injunction merely because another view on the merits is possible. A shareholders' resolution empowering a sub-committee to determine disputed proxies and declare an election result extends to acting on proxies found valid and regulating the poll under section 185 of the Companies Act, 1956. A party retaining benefits under the same resolution cannot challenge another part of it inconsistently. Absence of a prima facie case and an unfavourable balance of convenience justify refusal of interim relief. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:35:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99863 Revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to jurisdictional error, illegality or material irregularity and does not permit reassessment of concurrent discretionary refusals of temporary injunction merely because another view on the merits is possible. A shareholders' resolution empowering a sub-committee to determine disputed proxies and declare an election result extends to acting on proxies found valid and regulating the poll under section 185 of the Companies Act, 1956. A party retaining benefits under the same resolution cannot challenge another part of it inconsistently. Absence of a prima facie case and an unfavourable balance of convenience justify refusal of interim relief. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99863