https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99841 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed. The appellant successfully argued that the demand invoking a longer period of limitation was unjustified, emphasizing their transparent communication with the Revenue Department and lack of evidence of duty evasion. The judgment underscored the importance of accurate goods classification for excise duty and transparent communication to prevent disputes and ensure tax compliance. en-us Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:04:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99841 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed. The appellant successfully argued that the demand invoking a longer period of limitation was unjustified, emphasizing their transparent communication with the Revenue Department and lack of evidence of duty evasion. The judgment underscored the importance of accurate goods classification for excise duty and transparent communication to prevent disputes and ensure tax compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99841