<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 843 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99831</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the confiscation of common salt valued at Rs. 11,000 and the personal penalty of Rs. 5,000. The tribunal determined that there was insufficient evidence to support the authorities&#039; actions and granted the appellant the benefit of the doubt. The appeal was successful, and the stay petition was resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:47:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 843 - CEGAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99831</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the confiscation of common salt valued at Rs. 11,000 and the personal penalty of Rs. 5,000. The tribunal determined that there was insufficient evidence to support the authorities&#039; actions and granted the appellant the benefit of the doubt. The appeal was successful, and the stay petition was resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>