https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99824 Where a company has been wound up, the company court may transfer pending proceedings concerning it under section 446(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 read with rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 if transfer is expedient in the interest of justice and enables effective control over the winding up. An application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act pending at a preliminary stage in another High Court was transferred because the objection based on inconvenience and possible witnesses was unsupported by material and was insufficient to resist transfer. en-us Thu, 21 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:23:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99824 Where a company has been wound up, the company court may transfer pending proceedings concerning it under section 446(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 read with rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 if transfer is expedient in the interest of justice and enables effective control over the winding up. An application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act pending at a preliminary stage in another High Court was transferred because the objection based on inconvenience and possible witnesses was unsupported by material and was insufficient to resist transfer. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 21 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99824