https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99804 Orders of the company judge approving the liquidator's proposal to run the restaurants through contractors were treated as administrative, because they only sanctioned the liquidator's mode of conducting the company in liquidation and did not decide any right to property or any comparable lis between the parties. The choice of how the business should be run was left to the liquidator's discretion under the company judge's control, and a decision based on such subjective business consideration was held to be administrative rather than judicial. The result was that the orders were not appealable. en-us Thu, 12 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:00:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99804 Orders of the company judge approving the liquidator's proposal to run the restaurants through contractors were treated as administrative, because they only sanctioned the liquidator's mode of conducting the company in liquidation and did not decide any right to property or any comparable lis between the parties. The choice of how the business should be run was left to the liquidator's discretion under the company judge's control, and a decision based on such subjective business consideration was held to be administrative rather than judicial. The result was that the orders were not appealable. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99804