<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 915 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99801</link>
    <description>The dispute concerned only the quantum of redemption fine on confiscated imported goods. As the goods were no longer available for re-examination, and an earlier case involving the same party on identical facts had already fixed the redemption fine at 35% of the value of the goods, the impugned orders were modified to align with that prior view. The redemption fine was reduced to 35% of the value of the imported goods, and the assessee obtained relief accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:56:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 915 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99801</link>
      <description>The dispute concerned only the quantum of redemption fine on confiscated imported goods. As the goods were no longer available for re-examination, and an earlier case involving the same party on identical facts had already fixed the redemption fine at 35% of the value of the goods, the impugned orders were modified to align with that prior view. The redemption fine was reduced to 35% of the value of the imported goods, and the assessee obtained relief accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>